The bilateral commission considers the property conflicts between church and memorial estates. Why ROC to own objects in the territory of which church services are so conducted? And whether it is possible to reach compromise? Rostov Kremlin. Photo: depositphotos.com B Ministry of Culture the bilateral commission considers the property conflicts between ROC and memorial estates around the well-known monasteries and temples. Art dealers, priests, restorers, art critics and other experts are a part of the commission. The cochairman from ROC — the head of patriarchal council for culture, the metropolitan Tikhon Shevkunov. From museum workers — the research supervisor of the Museums of the Moscow Kremlin complex Alexey Levykin. Earlier the Kommersant newspaper has reported that in the agenda — questions of transfer of ROC of architectural monuments Kirillo-Belozersky and Ferapontovo of monasteries, the Rostov Kremlin, 12 objects in Vladimir and Suzdal. All these objects — the state memorial estates, part of them enters the list of the World heritage of UNESCO. These statuses provide them public finance and the security status. Is it necessary to renew them on ROC? The cochairman of the bilateral commission Alexey Levykin considers that activity can be and joint: Alexey Levykin is a cochairman of the bilateral commission of Ministry of Culture "We as museum community always we try to solve this problem on the platform of mutual use. So, for example, we did in the Historical museum. We will try to continue to resolve these issues in dialogue, considering specifics and features of ROC, museum community and culture. Here, please, to you history with Pokrovsky Cathedral at Red Square. We interact on the basis of the agreement, there pass services: festive services, Sunday services, daily. We restore, we carry out restoration works. All this in interaction can be solved. Foreign practice too not such simple on interaction of church and state. There too are unique monuments which are in possession and in hands of church, there are also monuments which are in the state, but all perform the functions on preservation of these objects". Why do churches to own objects in the territory of which and so ceremonies go and church services are conducted? Opinion of the protodeacon Andrey Kurayeva:andrey Kurayev the protodeacon "For partnership in a cut of budget money. Because all the same when these temples appear on balance of the diocese, it all the same right there will tell: and we have no money for their contents and restoration. Also will ask the same Ministry of Culture: no, all of you equally pay — such maintenance, capital and so on. But as already the diocese will be the owner, she can quickly dispose of this money on the benefit. That's all. If something happens all claims to art dealers, and money we, but from us don't have demand. That is it is a position of church in the modern world — we we don't answer for anything. That is, as soon as money is necessary, we near the state as soon as they demand control — we from you are separated". As an example for Ku
"Lucifer" took control of Europe
Date: 2019-06-26 21:006 hrs ago
The African atmospheric front which brought an abnormal heat — under 40 degrees Celsius of the Photo came to the Old World: Charles Platiau/Reuters the European countries was covered by an abnormal he...
View details »
Why does Mail.ru refuse habitual passwords?
Date: 2019-06-25 16:00yesterday
It will be possible to come into mail by means of one-time codes from SMS and push-notices. It considerably increases safety of service, experts of the Photo say: depositphotos.com Users of Mail.ru wi...
View details »
Second Chernobyl or next cranberry?
Date: 2019-06-25 21:00yesterday
The Strimingovy service Netflix starts the project devoted to Romanov' dynasty. The first season of series "Last Tsars" will appear already on July 3. Whether it will manage to the American show runne...
View details »