Penalties, by words the head of Dumas committee on the budget and taxes, will concern those who will switch over to new tax regime, but will break it. So for as who will be fined? What do self-employed think of it? Photo: depositphotos.com the Head of the State Duma Budget and Taxes Committee Andrey Makarov has said that media have misunderstood his words about future penalties. It is no longer about that self-employed will deprive completely of income if they refuse to be registered. As Makarov says, what is offered self-employed — the most comfortable tax regime. Only 4%, and it will be possible to pay taxes through the application on the smartphone. But if the person who is already registered in this system tries to hide some income then there will be penalties, Makarov the head of the State Duma Budget and Taxes Committee "Explains on:andry if he hasn't created the fiscal check, then in this case there comes responsibility. In the first case when it occurs, it is 20% of the sum which had to pass by this check. Here you sell pies, you for ten pies have sent the check, and for the eleventh — no. The eleventh check, the sum of this pie is and there is a sum of a penalty, 20% of the fact that you have received for this pie. And now a question in the following: if repeatedly the person makes it, and not just repeatedly, and within six months, this systematic violation of that mode in which you voluntarily, I emphasize, with the state has entered, in this case the sum of a penalty will equal these most 100% by this check. About any all income too the speech doesn't go, it is only about the check according to this concrete transaction". As Makarov claims, there is no speech that will take away all income from those who won't be registered in new system. For those who will remain in the shadow nothing will change, but to them can make a complaint on non-payment of taxes. "Or to them racket will come, and the state won't be able to protect them" — the deputy has told. However 4% of a tax — it is all the same are a lot of, and penalties sensitive, Gennady who works with the tutor on обществознанию: says — If people have gone to self-employment, then it isn't necessary to tax them at all — let's them grow up. Self-employed grows, opens the enterprise already more, and then it is already possible to milk it. And so even 4% are pernicious. For me 4% are much, even 1% is a lot of. At first will register, then will raise a rate — generally, classics. — For the first violation of 20% of the sum of income are, of course, not 100%, but is how sensitive? — Any penalty is sensitive, especially a penalty which has under itself(himself) no moral justification. On the other hand, self-employed along with those who pay 13% of a personal income tax also free of charge use medicine, receive pensions. What tax regime do they consider optimum for themselves? Zhanna who carries out orders as the graphic designer answers: "I pay taxes, as well as everything, on the real estate, on all the rest. The same taxes I pay everything, as the ordinary, normal person who works officially is employed. Also I from the money which I receive pay
Princes and beggars of local parliaments
Date: 2019-05-18 05:003 days ago
Regional deputies published data on the income for last year: 60 people have incomes below the poverty line, and 11 in general declared zero level of income of the Photo: depositphotos.com Deputies of...
View details »
"Night of the museums". How it was?
Date: 2019-05-19 22:00yesterday
In Moscow the thirteenth action of the same name took place. This year their 350 Photos joined it 60 new platforms, now: Sergey Vedyashkin/AGN Moscow If a few years ago complained of rather small numb...
View details »