After a wave of cancellations of concerts of rappers and other performers, after hype around unlawful in texts media persons urge "not to nightmarize" musicians, suggest to return censorship. Whether it is possible to establish a framework permitted in creativity and who will judge? Mikhail Boyarsky. Photo: Stanislav In Russia borders permitted in creativity do not stop discussing Krasilnikov/TASS. The ideas arise the most different. The leader of "Messages of week" on "Russia 1" Dmitry Kiselyov urged "not to nightmarize rappers", and the actor Mikhail Boyarsky at first to "Rain", and then and RIA Novosti told about advantage of the arts councils. According to Boyarsky, "the art dissoluteness" does not do well to the state, and by means of censorship it is possible to fight against "bad music, a mat and cheap plays". So it is better: censorship or prosecutor's office? On the one hand, now prosecutors cancel concerts on formal sign and on what, it is clear only to them. Some can use foul language, another is not present. One about drugs — please, to others it is even impossible to use the word "be homeless". To the same actor in one city allow to read texts about sex and the forbidden substances to 12-year-old children, and to it in other city cancel the same concert marked by a tag 16. Men in uniform cannot penetrate into a context, and members of the arts councils can if they are picked correctly up. Therefore Boyarsky's idea has supporters, but who will give guarantees that the arts councils will consist only of unconditional authorities. Besides there is a risk that with the arts councils also practice of conciliation will return, and also self-censorships are farther. We already passed all this, the director Yury Bykov says. According to him, the prosecutor's office in this context seems even somehow more honestly. Yury Bykov is a director "The prosecutor's office acts under the legislation, there to it somehow it is possible belongs, but examination after all directly depends on this legislation. The arts council is often subjective judgment of certain people, and all people different therefore in terms of objectivity of esthetic views and what is good and that is bad in art, the arts council is an opinion biased". In practice the objectivity of prosecutor's office, unfortunately, too suffers. Mikhail Boyarsky's idea about return of the arts councils is commented by the theatrical director, professor of the Russian university of theater Iosif Raykhelgauz: Iosif Raykhelgauz is a director, professor of the Russian university of theater "I agrees that my works were estimated by my colleagues. It already happens, for example, in GITIS when my colleagues — Dmitry Krymov, Sergey Zhenovach, Kamenkovich, Heifetz, professors of other workshops — watch works of my students, professor Raykhelgauz. They can tell everything that is found necessary, I understand the level of my colleagues and I accept everything that they tell. But as soon as the illiterate official, and them begins to tell me about my work, unfortunately, most governing bodies of our culture, let them direct Boyarsky's enterprise of which they make light
Media: "Scarlet sails" are displaced
Date: 2019-02-15 18:0020 hrs ago
According to RBC, the retail network which was considered as the main competitor of Alphabets of Taste earlier is offered for sale. The network exists since 1999 the Photo: Vladimir Gerdo / the Scarle...
View details »
What actually will be with petrol prices?
Date: 2019-02-15 23:0015 hrs ago
There are no risks of increase in prices for fuel now — the Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak so said to journalists. However, the other day he reported, as conditions of the market of the Photo will...
View details »