Officials will be financially stimulated to carry out the May decree. As will estimate merits of government employees, unclear, perhaps, will introduce efficiency indicators. Whether it will help? What does the former staff of the government think of an initiative? Photo: depositphotos.com the Government in three years will spend more than one half-trillion rubles for motivation of officials. It follows from the draft of the federal budget, RBC writes. And the sum much more, than was planned earlier. Kirill Tremasov is the former head of one of departments of the Ministry of Economic Development, and nowadays the director of the analytical department "Loco-invest". "When I worked in the government, my salary was modest, many times it is less, than at the good analyst in bank" — he tells. But this salary — only 30% of revenue. Other 70% — quarter and annual awards. The minister approves them personally. And so, probably, occurs everywhere: KPI of the official in Russia is a personal opinion of the chief. As for those hundreds of billions with which the authorities will motivate themselves to execute the May decree, Kirill Tremasov assumes what is so simply veiled will raise a salary. Kirill Tremasov the director of the analytical department "Loco-invest" "Three quarters of income of the employee depends on desire of your chief. He had liked you, weren't pleasant, have smiled, haven't so made something. This situation generates an arbitrariness and not always fair compensation. What do we in general speak about? What motivation? You see, it was called just like that. I suspect that the speech, most likely, goes just about increase in this bonus fund". Key performance indicators, or KPI use around the world, but first of all — in business. There everything is simple. One manager this year has sold, for example, ten chairs, and another — 15. Second good fellow, here to him bonus. But also here additions meet. With officials another story altogether. They make nothing, they regulate. Let's say situation: one official has explained nothing to business, and the second has filled up him with letters with instructions and recommendations. Who is more effective? Correct answer: neither that, nor another. Though the second from outside looks the zealous fighter for the business. "When I was a minister, I had five chiefs" — the former head of Ministry of Labor Sergey Kalashnikov remembers — and everyone constantly demanded something". Sergey Kalashnikov the former head of Ministry of Labor "Naturally, for me, as well as for any official of any level, not real performance of all these things, and realization, so to say, of external indicators was important, the fact that this task is performed. On the other hand, when the administrative difficult decision is made, the head always faces a risk problem: and if it isn't possible? Therefore it is natural that the main emphasis is placed on that it is formal all requirements have been observed, and upward there are only victorious reports". There is also other party: not all government employees receive really decent salaries. To find good experts, it is necessary to resort to tricks. Case of "dead souls" in Roskomn
Red caviar can rise in price for a third
Date: 2019-07-22 11:0011 hrs ago
Reported about it in News agency on fishery. But experts note that the fishing season only began and to tell about the significant changes in price early the Photo: depositphotos.com Red caviar this y...
View details »
Rostec decided to borrow in the market
Date: 2019-07-22 14:008 hrs ago
The state corporation plans to issue bonds up to 100 billion rubles. Money will go to the OAK projects and KamAZ. Whether such papers are interesting to investors and what it is worth filling up the i...
View details »
Who bought up all apartments in June?
Date: 2019-07-22 20:002 hrs ago
Last month more than 11.5 thousand DDU on the residential real estate — 54% more were registered, than in May, and it is twice more, than in June of the 2018th. It is the Photo indicator, record durin...
View details »