The court agreed with assessment in 3 billion rubles. It turns out, Kalvi did not cause damage, and saved to Vostochny bank 0.5 billion. But "when there is a scope for assessment, so there is a place for subjectivity", Konstantin Simonov Michael Kalvi considers. Photo: Andrey Nikerichev/AGN Moscow the Moscow arbitration made the decision connected with business of Baring Vostok. The most important in it is assessment of stocks of the collection company, RBC writes. The court confirmed that they cost 3 billion rubles, and it, most likely, will become an argument for Michael Kalvi during criminal proceedings. To estimate the decision of the Moscow arbitration, it is necessary to remind an outline of events once again. Kalvi and other managers were accused that they remitted a debt in 2.5 billion rubles of the First collection company. Instead of money the Vostochny bank received its shares. The investigation believes that it is damage because actions cost not 2.5 billion, but only 600 thousand rubles. But, it appears, last year the very first collection company submitted a claim to the Moscow arbitration. It considers that if to whom caused damage, then it to it because its actions cost more than 3 billion rubles, and alienate them for 2.5 billion. As proof the company presented expert assessment. The court ordered examination too, and it estimated stocks of the company at 3 billion rubles too. The arbitration agreed with this assessment. On this logic Michael Kalvi not only did not cause damage, he also saved to bank half a billion. With this argument he can address criminal court now. In general news to the investor good, the senior partner of lawyer bureau Forward Legal Alexey Karpenko says. Alexey Karpenko is a lawyer, the senior partner of the Forward Legal company "These can appeal in criminal case from Kalvi's protection, it is possible to say about what, look at, the independent examination appointed by arbitration court came besides to a conclusion to what Kalvi and the board of directors of Vostochny bank and also their contractors came in due time that the cost of a package is more than 3 billion rubles. For the investigation it will be an argument. Certainly, it is possible to challenge that assessment which will be appointed the investigation by means of this assessment too. But it will not have the value some solving, defining". The court can consider assessment especially as it was confirmed not by somebody, and the Moscow arbitration, and can not consider and believe investigators. Though too big difference — 600 thousand and 3 billion rubles, in five thousand times more. But the opinion sounded more than once that, despite all merits of Michael Kalvi in front of Russia, the transaction really seems doubtful. And art of assessment of assets is in general a subject for a separate conversation, the CEO of National Energy Security Fund Konstantin Simonov says. Konstantin Simonov the CEO of National Energy Security Fund "When we speak about asset assessment, on the one hand, there a heap is written textbooks by assessment and experts. But all the same we understand that here borders very flexible and mobile. It leaves, of course, space for interpretation. In ours
What caused industrial production growth?
Date: 2019-05-23 13:002 days ago
According to Rosstat, growth of industrial production in April accelerated up to 4.9%. It is a maximum in the last two years the Photo: Valery of Matytsin/TASS Industrial production in Russia in April...
View details »
What not so with trains in the Moscow subway?
Date: 2019-05-24 21:0013 hrs ago
On Thursday, May 23, between Altufyevo and Bibirevo stations the "Oka" train broke. The Metrovagonmash producer will pay a fine of 1.5 million rubles of the Photo: Sergey of Fadeichev/TASS If you ofte...
View details »